update readme

This commit is contained in:
yiranyyu
2024-05-23 18:55:12 +08:00
parent b564771def
commit d57be43fa5
2 changed files with 7 additions and 47 deletions

View File

@@ -1,57 +1,17 @@
## Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct vs MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5
Comparison results of Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct and MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5, regarding the model size, hardware requirements, and performances.
With int4 quantization, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 delivers **smooth inference with only 8GB of GPU memory**. In most benchmarks, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 achieves **better performance** compared with Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct. Moreover, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 also exhibits **lower latency and better throughtput even without quantization**.
我们提供了从模型参数、硬件需求、性能指标等方面对比 Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct 和 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 的结果。
## Hardeware Requirements (硬件需求)
我们提供了从模型参数、硬件需求、性能指标等方面对比 Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct 和 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 的结果。通过 int4 量化MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 **仅需 8GB 显存即可推理**。在大多数评测集上, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 相比于 Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct 都展现出了**更优的性能表现**。 即使未经量化MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 的**推理延迟和吞吐率也都更具优势**。
With int4 quantization, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 delivers smooth inference with only 8GB of GPU memory.
通过 int4 量化MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 仅需 8GB 显存即可推理。
| Model模型 | GPU Memory显存 |
|:----------------------|:-------------------:|
| [MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5](https://huggingface.co/openbmb/MiniCPM-Llama3-V-2_5/) | 19 GB |
| Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct | 12 GB |
| [MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 (int4)](https://huggingface.co/openbmb/MiniCPM-Llama3-V-2_5-int4/) | 8 GB |
## Model Size and Peformance (模型参数和性能)
In most benchmarks, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 achieves **better performance** compared with Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct. Moreover, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 also exhibits **lower latency and better throughtput even without quantization**.
在大多数评测集上, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 相比于 Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct 都展现出了**更优的性能表现**。 即使未经量化MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 的**推理延迟和吞吐率也都更具优势**。
| | Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct | MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5|
|:-|:----------:|:-------------------:|
| Size参数 | **4B** | 8B|
| First Token Latency首token延迟<sup>2</sup> | L: 330ms, M: 330ms, H: 330ms | **L: 48ms, M: 145ms, H: 278ms** |
| Throughtput吞吐率<sup>2</sup>| 30 tokens/s | **41 tokens/s**|
| OpenCompass 2024/05 | 53.7 | **58.8** |
| OCRBench | 639.0 | **725.0**|
| RealworldQA | 58.8 | **63.5**|
| TextVQA | 72.2 | **76.6** |
| ScienceQA| **90.8** | 89.0 |
| POPE | 83.4 | **87.2** |
| MathVista | 44.5 | **54.3** |
| MMStar | 47.4 | **51.8** |
| LLaVA Bench | 64.2 | **86.7** |
| AI2D | 76.7 | **78.4** |
<small>
1: L(ow): 448pxl, M(edium): 896pxl, H(igh): 1344pxl input images.
<br>
1. Evaluation environment: A800 GPU, flash-attn=2.4.3, batch-size=1.
<br>
<span style="color:grey">
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 shows better first token latency and throughput performance even though the number of parameters is twice as large as that of Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct due to its efficient image encoding method and adaptive resolution encoding strategy. For example, for an input images with a 448x448 resolution, MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 encodes it into 96 tokens, while Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct encodes it into 2500+ tokens. Longer image token sequence significantly affects the first token latency and throughput. MiniCPM-V series models insist on obtaining stronger performance with more efficient encoding, thus achieves efficient end-device deployment and providing better experience for end users.
<br>
得益于 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 高效的图像编码方式和自适应分辨率编码策略,即使参数量比 Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 大一倍,依然展现出了更出色的首 token 延迟和吞吐量表现。例如两个模型对输入分辨率为448x448 的图像MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 的图像编码长度为 96 而Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 的图像编码长度为 2500+。更长的图像编码长度会显著影响首token延迟和吞吐量MiniCPM-V系列坚持用更高效的编码方式撬动更强的性能进而实现高效的终端设备部署为端侧用户提供更良好的体验。
</span>
</small>
<div align="center">
<img src="../assets/phi3_vision_comparison.jpg" width="85%" />
</div>
## Multilingual Capabilities
### Multilingual Capabilities多语言能力对比
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 exhibits **stronger multilingual** capabilities compared with Phi-3-vision-128K-Instruct on LLaVA Bench.